Who To Blame For The Global Financial Crisis

This essay will discourse about what cause the planetary fiscal crisis in 2007 and who have to be blamed. By looking this assignment, we will happen the point where the planetary fiscal crisis was caused whether corporate greed, regulative failure, or some other factors. We will happen some issues and grounds sing this subject and see how it can do the planetary fiscal crisis.

This essay consists of debut, organic structure, and decision. On the debut, I will brief explicate about the background of planetary fiscal crisis and province my point of position towards the job. On the organic structure, I will discourse more about the planetary fiscal crisis and depict the theories of societal duties and ordinance which have relation to the subject. Then, I will utilize these theories to discourse the crisis, its cause, and make up one’s mind who is the most responsible towards the crisis. I will besides happen some grounds and back uping thoughts that relates to the subject from newspaper, articles and some other beginnings that might be relevant. On the decision, I will sum up all issues that discussed in this essay and decide who have to be blamed for doing the planetary fiscal crisis.

Background Event

Fiscal crisis was ‘introduced ‘ in U.S during 2008. There are many causes that trigger planetary fiscal crisis. Some say it because of failure in banking sector ; the others say it is due to the corporation that make it go on. There are no right replies to react what the major cause of this job. However, the impact is decidedly immense toward the fiscal system over the states in the universe. For case, during the crisis, the stock markets in U.S were dead and tend to diminish towards break[ 1 ]. These impacts besides spread to all over the states. To counter the wild spread of the crisis, authorities in many states had taken some actions to counter the crisis. One of the actions that authorities choose is presenting financial stimulation to the economic system. This action may countervail the decrease in private sector demand caused by the crisis[ 2 ]

From the issues that we are traveling to be discussed, I believed that the primary cause of the planetary fiscal crisis was because of regulative failure, corporate greed and some other factors that might be relevant. Although the inquiry province that I have to take one of those primaries causes, nevertheless, I think that all of them are taking portion of the planetary fiscal crisis.


Global Financial Crisis

There are many issues sing the beginnings of planetary fiscal crisis. The crisis itself began in 2008 where at that clip tonss of American and European companies were belly-up following the sub-prime mortgages. During September 2008, two American houses, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were nationalised by authorities, following the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers and Merrill Lynch twosomes of hebdomads subsequently. Due to these bankruptcies, it causes a major instability on the planetary stock markets with major lessening in market value of stocks.[ 3 ]

Harmonizing to Johnson, this crisis was ab initio started due to the prostration of the lodging market in U.S[ 4 ]. Sub-prime mortgages are besides taking portion on this devastation. Back in 1990s, lodging monetary value in the U.S rose at compound one-year growing rate of 8 % per annum. By 2006, the mean place cost about four times compared with the norm of household income[ 5 ]. The ordinary state of affairs would be demand lessening as the monetary value addition ; nevertheless, the existent state of affairs was the demand excesses its supply. It is because of easing loaning demands through sub-prime mortgages that leads to more and more people were low-cost to purchase houses. Many people were taking advantage from this state of affairs, particularly those who had bad recognition evaluations. As the consequence, people began defaulting particularly those who have sub-prime mortgage. This state of affairs leads to pricing houses get downing to split and forcing the lodging monetary values down well doing planetary fiscal crisis[ 6 ].

Another cause of the crisis is due to corporate greed which done by mortgage loaning industry. As per Juurikala, the job is non the recognition, but, how recognition was traded from one manus to another on an unprecedented graduated table. This was done through fiscal inventions called derivative[ 7 ]. Derived functions allow people to reassign their recognition hazards to the 3rd parties.

Harmonizing to Jordan, by utilizing derivative, it allows money to reassign more freely and offers more protection against the hazard of fiscal loss. In add-on, it besides offered ‘fair ‘ returns to investors who are willing to take that hazard[ 8 ]. If derivative are used decently, it may apportion hazards expeditiously which might benefits to all parties, if non, so it merely a tool to construct greed. For case, derived function could be used to avoid ordinances that protect investors and public. In add-on, derived function could do many establishments made a bad stakes without being regulated[ 9 ]. As the consequence, the houses could bring forth supranormal net incomes, directors generate high fillips and investors generate high return if it is win, otherwise, they may see a immense losingss. Now, we can see from grounds that derivative generates more losingss than its benefits and it is due to greed done by imparting industry who invented the derived functions which creates the crisis.

Regulative failure and deregulatings besides takes into history as a cause of fiscal crisis. Harmonizing to Andrew Lo, there is a positive relationship between relaxation of ordinances on Bankss during the late ninetiess and early 2000s and the most recent fiscal crisis[ 10 ]. Back in 1933, there is an act named Glass Steagall Act ( which besides known as Banking Act ) that regulates abuse and command the degree of hazard through separation between commercial Bankss and investing Bankss. However, in 1999, this act was taken from statute law and opened up competitions among Bankss[ 11 ]. This creates the commercial bank could besides move as investing bank and investing Bankss could besides move as commercial bank. Furthermore, there are non adequate regulations and ordinance to modulate the fiscal system.

As the illustration:

During 2004, the Securities and Exchange Commission deregulates the net capital regulation. As a consequence, investing Bankss are able addition in immense sum of debt and raising the growing in mortgage-backed securities and subprime mortgage[ 12 ].

There is no ordinance for fiscal establishment in the shadow banking system same as depositary bank which leting them to presume extra debt duty relation to their capital[ 13 ].

In add-on, subscribing a new act besides contributes to faster the planetary fiscal crisis to go on. One of the illustrations is the confirmation of Commodity Futures Modernization Act by authorities. This ordinance considered as a failure ordinance as it creates the derived functions market unregulated[ 14 ].

Social Responsibilities Theories

There are 2 theoretical accounts from the theories of societal duties which may associate to this subject. The theories are: The ‘narrow ‘ position or stockholder position and the ‘wide ‘ position or stakeholder position.

‘Narrow ‘ / Shareholder View

The ‘narrow ‘ position or stockholder position was introduced by Milton Friedman which states that concern is responsible to maximize net incomes for its stockholders and should besides carry on the concern within the regulations of the society[ 15 ]. Those stockholders are the people who are the ‘owner ‘ of that company who holding portions and common financess from that company[ 16 ].

The thought of stockholders position was originated by Adam Smith ‘s statement of unseeable manus. Harmonizing to Smith, people are continuously exercising themselves looking for the best return. His statement back uping the useful position for free market system[ 17 ]. Accord with Adam Smith theory of free market system, Friedman has developed neo-liberal in the economic policies in 20th century[ 18 ]. Friedman besides agrees with Smith ‘s position that the market is in efficient degree.

However, Friedman statement ‘s is criticised by Arrow. Harmonizing to Arrow, he believes that market is non in efficient degree[ 19 ]. For case, pollution created by concern activities and asymmetric information between purchasers and Sellerss. This statement justify that ordinance may take to the greater efficiency[ 20 ].

‘Wide ‘ / Stakeholder View

On the other manus, the ‘wide ‘ position or stakeholder position was introduced by Ed Freeman and provinces that a concern is non merely responsible to its stockholder but besides have to responsible with their stakeholder[ 21 ]. Stakeholders are those people without whose support the organisation would discontinue to be[ 22 ]. There are 2 classs sing the stakeholder: Primary and Secondary. Primary stakeholders are: employees, clients, providers, etc ; and secondary stakeholders are: media, rivals, authorities, and involvement groups[ 23 ].

There are 2 theoretical accounts sing stakeholders position: Strategic stakeholder and Multi-fiduciary stakeholder

Basically, strategic stakeholder theoretical account is likely same as stockholder position where a concern have to maximise their net income to stockholder. However, on strategic stakeholder, a company should besides pay attending to those other stakeholder groups that may act upon the company in maximizing net income[ 24 ]

On the other manus, multi-fiduciary theoretical account implies that all the stakeholder involvement have to be treated every bit while determination devising are made. In add-on, direction of peculiar company has fiducial responsibility to all stakeholders and net income maximization does non ever come foremost over the involvement of other stakeholder groups[ 25 ]


Regulations are made to counter the bad side of free markets. As I mentioned before, free markets is non in efficient degree but instead inefficient. Pollution, monopolies and negative outwardnesss are the grounds that shows the market is inefficient. That is why ordinances are of import to make greater efficiency[ 26 ]. However, making ordinances are non easy as there are some restrictions while making ordinances. As illustration, participants who are the topic of the ordinance are have more cognition than the regulators. Thus it may ensue in deficiency of consensus in values and in cause and consequence which may creates the ordinance unenforceable and non back uping value[ 27 ].

There are many signifiers of ordinance in this society such as: legal ordinance, self-regulation, ethical codifications, etc. These ordinances are used to make greater efficiency in the market. Common ordinance that we normally know is authorities ordinance. Legal or authorities ordinances are ordinances made by authorities by which a concern is required to externality enforceable criterions of concern behavior[ 28 ].

Self ordinance is the ordinance that regulates that concern itself. This is done through trade association, societal ordinance ( e.g. norms ) , co-regulation and market ordinance[ 29 ].

However, self ordinance might bring forth some jobs:

Divergence[ 30 ]

There is a divergency between corporation ‘s involvement as a rival and as a member of the community. For case, as a community, corporations accept a cleaner environment. As a rival, company accept cleaner environment since they want to minimise their pollution control cost.

Prisoner ‘s Dilemma[ 31 ]

It is the scheme done by company of non lending the cost of public goods as the company will be better of if they do non lend

Assurance Problem[ 32 ]

Each corporation resist their part for public goods because they could non obtain the confidence that other company will lend on the same degree.

The Relation between Facts and Theories

Associating to the instance, it seems that the executives of company merely prioritise stockholder ‘s involvement instead than community ‘s involvement as a whole. Former Prime curate of Australia, Kevin Rudd besides said that community have lost many things because of the crisis which was non of their devising but instead because of the fiscal executives surrendered any pretension of societal duty in their blind chase of absolute greed[ 33 ]. As per stockholder position, company should maximize net income for stockholder and comply with regulations and ordinance, nevertheless, by looking at the facts of planetary fiscal crisis, it seems that the company, particularly the executives, concentrating excessively much on maximising net income which more likely toward greed. This state of affairs makes the company does non maximize stockholder value any longer as the greed creates the crisis and suffered the stockholder.

In add-on, as per stakeholder position, company should besides responsible to stakeholder ( i.e. : community ) while making concern. But, in this instance, the company giving problem to the community by presenting derived functions to the market at usage it as a tool to harvest the maximal benefits and creates the crisis. Therefore, in this instance, the company

to greed done by imparting industry who invented the derived functions which creates the crisis.