Other financial decision variables

Introduction

Capital Structure is one of the most complex countries of fiscal determination devising because of its interrelatedness with other fiscal determination variables. Poor capital construction determinations can ensue in high cost of capital thereby take downing the Net Present Values of undertakings and doing more of them unacceptable. Effective capital construction determination can take down the cost of capital, thereby increasing the value of the house.

Since capital is expensive for little concerns, it is peculiarly of import for little concern proprietors to find a mark capital construction for their houses. Capital construction determinations involve weighing a assortment of factors. In general, companies that have stable gross revenues degrees, assets that give good returns for loans and a high growing rate can utilize debt more to a great extent than other companies. On the other manus, companies that has conservative direction, high profitableness, or hapless recognition evaluations rely on equity capital alternatively.

Capital Structure

Capital construction is a concern finance term that describes the proportion of a company ‘s capital, or runing money, that is obtained through debt and equity orhybrid securities [ 1 ] . Debt includes loans and other types of recognition that must be repaid in the hereafter, normally with involvement. Equity involves selling a partial involvement in the company to investors, normally in the signifier of stock. In contrast to debt funding, equity funding does non affect a direct duty to refund the financess. Alternatively, equity investors become part-owners and spouses in the concern, and therefore are able to exert some grade of control over how it is run.

The end of a company ‘s capital construction determination is to maximise the additions for the equity stockholders. The optimum capital construction is the 1 that strikes a balance between hazard and return and thereby maximizes the monetary value of the stock and at the same time minimizes the cost of capital. [ 2 ]

A house ‘s major determination is its fiscal determinations which can be analyzed in the theory of Corporate Capital Structure that is based on a theoretical account developed by Dodd ( 1986 ) and is determined chiefly by cost variables- equity, debt and bankruptcy hazard and other possible variables such as growing are, profitableness and operating purchase.

The primary advantage of debt funding is that it allows the laminitiss to retain ownership and control of the company. Debt duties are limited to the loan refund period, after which the loaner has no farther claim on the concern, whereas equity investors ‘ claim does non stop until their stock is sold. Debt funding tends to be less expensive for little concerns over the long term, though more expensive over the short term, than equity funding. The major disadvantage is that it requires a little concern to do regular monthly payments of chief and involvement. Very immature companies frequently experience deficits in hard currency flow that may do such regular payments hard. Another disadvantage associated with debt funding is that its handiness is frequently limited to established concerns. Since loaners chiefly seek security for their financess, it can be hard for unproved concerns to obtain loans.

The chief advantage of equity funding for little concerns is that there is no duty to refund the money. Equity funding is besides more likely to be available to concept and early phase concerns than debt funding. Another advantage of equity funding is that investors frequently prove to be good beginnings of advice and contacts for little concern proprietors. The chief disadvantage of equity funding is that the laminitiss must give up some control of the concern. If investors have different thoughts about the company ‘s strategic way or daily operations, they can present jobs for the enterpriser. In add-on, some gross revenues of equity, such as initial public offerings, can be really complex and expensive to administrate. Such equity funding may necessitate complicated legal filings and a great trade of paperwork to follow with assorted ordinances.

Features of a Capital Structure

Capital construction is that degree of debt-equity proportion where the market value per-share is maximal and the cost of capital is minimal.

It should hold the undermentioned characteristics:

  • Profitability/Return: Surveies have shown that the relationship between debt-equity ratio and a house ‘s net income border is such that for a house which prefers to finance its investings through self-finance are more profitable than houses which finance investing through borrowed capital, houses prefer viing with each other than collaborating and houses use their investing in fixed assets as a strategic variable to impact profitableness. [ 3 ]
  • Solvency/Risk: Capital Structure of a house indicates how much the company is leveraged by comparing what it owes to creditors and investors to what it owns. It reveals the grade to which the company ‘s direction is willing to fund its operations with debt, instead than equity. Lenders are sensitive about this characteristic as a high debt-equity ratio will set their loans at hazard of being unpaid. [ 4 ]
  • Flexibility: Flexibility is the ability to do determinations that the steadfast thinks are most disposed even when others disagree. The degree of flexibleness the direction can hold depends on how the house is financed. Debt offers small flexibleness relative to equity. However, the flexibleness offered by equity depends on the extent to which stockholders are inclined to hold with direction ‘s strategic picks. The flexibleness benefit of equity is high merely when the portion monetary value is high. [ 5 ]
  • Conservation/Capacity: If a house starts with a particular concern hazard, so the sum hazard associated with stock and debt is non affected by the capital construction. This is called ‘conservation of hazard ‘ . Hazard is neither created nor destroyed. [ 6 ] Debt capacity involves the appraisal of the sum of debt that the organisation can refund in a timely mode without give uping its fiscal viability. [ 7 ]
  • Control: The capital construction of a house shows when control is allocated to merely stockholders and when to others like creditors, or the direction squad. By and large the stockholders get control when the house ‘s hard currency flow is sensitive. Besides, debt value and house value are negatively correlated when debtholders have veto power [ 8 ]

Determinants of Capital Structure

Capital construction of a house is determined by assorted internal and external factors. The macro variables of the economic system are rising prices rate, revenue enhancement policy of authorities, capital market status. The features of an single house, termed as micro factors ( internal ) , besides affect the capital construction of endeavors. This subdivision presents how the micro-factors affect the capital construction of a house

  • Size of a Firm: There is a positive relation between the capital construction and size of a house. The larger the houses the more diversified they are. They have easy entree to the capital market, have higher recognition evaluations for debt issues, and pay lower involvement rate on debt capital. Further, larger houses are less prone to bankruptcy and this implies the less chance of bankruptcy and lower bankruptcy costs. Hence, the lower bankruptcy costs, the higher debt degree. [ 9 ]
  • Growth Rate: There is a contradictory relation between the growing rate and capital construction. The equity controlled houses tend to put sub-optimally to acquire wealth from the endeavors ‘ bondholders. They are more flexibleness in their pick of future investing. Hence, growing rate is negatively related with long-run debt degree. [ 10 ]
  • Business Hazard: There is a negative relation between the capital construction and concern hazard. Lesser the stableness of the net incomes of the endeavors, the greater is the opportunity of concern failure and the greater the weight of bankruptcy costs on endeavor funding determinations. Hence, as concern hazard additions, the debt degree in capital construction of the endeavors should diminish. [ 11 ]
  • Dividend Payout: There is an inauspicious relation between the dividend payout ratio and debt degree in capital construction. The low dividend payout ratio means addition in the equity base for debt capital and low chance of traveling into settlement. As a consequence of low chance of bankruptcy, the bankruptcy cost is low. This implies high degree of debt in the capital construction. [ 12 ]
  • Operating Leverage: The usage of fixed cost in production procedure besides affects the capital construction. The high runing leverage-use of higher proportion of fixed cost in the entire costs over a period of time-can magnify the variableness in future net incomes. There is a negative relation between operating purchase and debt degree in capital construction. The higher operating purchase, the greater the opportunity of concern failure and the greater will be the weight of bankruptcy costs on endeavor funding determinations.
  • Industry Life Cycle: Firms tend to follow different funding schemes and a specific hierarchy of decision-making as they progress through the stages of their concern life rhythm. Debt is cardinal to concern activities in the early phases, stand foring the first pick. However, in the adulthood phase, houses re-balance their capital construction, replacing debt for internal capital. [ 13 ]
  • Degree of Competition: Debt ratios are reduced as the range of competition falls. For oligopolies, debt ratios show a important and positive consequence on monetary values. [ 14 ]
  • Company Features
  • : Variables of size and growing chance in entire assets reveal a positive association with the purchase ratio, nevertheless, profitableness, growing chances in works, belongings and equipment, non-debt revenue enhancement shields and tangibleness reveal reverse relation with debt degree. [ 15 ]

Forms of Capital Structure

Capital Structure can be of assorted signifiers:

  • Horizontal capital Structure: The house has no constituent of debt in the fiscal mix. Expansion of the house is through equity and retained net incomes merely.
  • Vertical Capital Structures: The base of the construction is a small sum of equity portion capital which serves as the foundation for a ace construction of penchant portion capital and debt.
  • Pyramid Shaped Capital Structure: Large proportion dwelling of equity capital and retained net incomes.
  • Inverted Pyramid molded Capital Structure: Small constituent of equity capital, sensible retained net incomes and increasing constituent of debt.

DIFFERENT APPROACHES TO CAPITAL STRUCTURE

Weighted Average Cost of Capital

It is the expected rate of return on the market value of all the house ‘s securities. Anything that increases the value of the house besides minimizes the WACC if operating income is changeless.

It is a computation of a house ‘s cost of capital in which each class of capital is proportionally weighted. All capital beginnings -common stock, preferable stock, bonds and any other long-run debt -are included in a WACC computation.

The WACC equationis the cost of each capital componentmultiplied by its relative weight and so summing:

WACC = E/V * Re + D/V * Rd * ( 1- Tc )

Where:

Re = cost of equity

Rd = cost of debt

E = market value of the house ‘s equity

D =market value of the house ‘s debt

V = E + D

E/V = per centum of funding that is equity

D/V = per centum of funding that is debt

Tc =corporate revenue enhancement rate

Premises

  • There is no income revenue enhancement, corporate or personal.
  • The house believes in paying all of its net incomes and dividends. A 100 % dividend payout ratio is assumed.
  • Investors have indistinguishable chance distributions of runing income for each company.
  • The operating income is non expected to turn or worsen over clip.
  • A house can alter its capital construction outright without incurring dealing costs.
  • rd represents the cost of debt
  • For 100 % dividend payout, rhenium represents cost of equity
  • V = D + E. Ra is the overall capitalization rate of the house. It can besides be expressed as: Ra = rd [ D/ ( D+E ) ] + rhenium [ E/ ( D+E ) ]

Net INCOME Approach

Harmonizing to NI attack both the cost of debt and the cost of equity are independent of the capital construction ; they remain changeless regardless of how much debt the house uses. This means that, the mean cost of capital diminutions and the house value increases with debt. This happens because when D/E increases, rd which is lower than rhenium, receives a higher weight in the computation of Ra.

This attack has no footing in world ; the optimal capital construction would be 100 per cent debt funding under NI attack.

This can be illustrated with the aid of a numerical. There are 2 houses A and B similar in all facets except in the grade of purchase employed.

Net OPERATING Income

It is the antonym of NI Approach. Harmonizing to NOI attack the value of the house and the overal5l capitalisation rate are independent of the house ‘s capital construction.

That is, Ra and rd are changeless for all grades of purchase. Now, rhenium = Ra + ( ra – rd ) ( D/E )

The market capitalizes the house as a whole at a price reduction rate which is independent of the house ‘s debt-equity ratio. In the absence of revenue enhancements, an single keeping all the debt and equity securities will have the same hard currency flows regardless of the capital construction and hence, value of the company is the same.

An addition in the usage of debt financess which are cheaper is offset by an addition in the equity capitalisation rate. This happens because equity investors seek higher compensation as they are exposed to greater hazard from addition in the grade of purchase. They increase the capitalisation rate rhenium as the purchase additions.

Numerically, this can be explained. Two houses A and B are similar in all facets except the grade of purchase employed by them.

TRADITIONAL Approach

The traditional attack argues that moderate grade of debt can take down the house ‘s overall cost of capital and thereby, increase the steadfast value. The initial addition in the cost of equity is more than offset by the lower cost of debt. But as debt additions, stockholders perceive higher hazard and the cost of equity rises until a point is reached at which the advantage of lower cost of debt is more than offset by more expensive equity.

The chief deduction of the traditional attack is that the cost of capital is dependent on the capital construction and there is an optimum capital construction which minimizes the cost of capital. At this degree, the existent fringy cost of debt and equity is the same.

MODIGLIANI AND MILLER POSITION

  • Similar to NOI Approach
  • Value of the house is independent to its capital construction i.e. Independence of entire rating and the cost of capital of the house from its capital construction
  • NOI is strictly conceptual, Does n’t supply operational justification
  • Supports NOI and provides behavioural justifications.

Premises:

1. Capital market is perfect

  • Investors are free to purchase and sell
  • Well informed market
  • Firm & amp ; investors can borrow on the same footings
  • Rational behaviour of investors
  • No dealing cost

2. Homogeneous hazard category

3. All investors have the same outlooks of the house ‘s EBIT

4. No Corporate Tax

Preposition I

‘The value of a house is equal to its expected operating income divided by the price reduction rate appropriate to its hazard category. It is independent of its capital construction. ‘ [ 16 ]

V= D + E = O/r

Where: Oxygen is the expected operating income ; R is the price reduction rate applicable to put on the line category.

MM invokes an arbitrage statement to turn out the preposition. In equilibrium, indistinguishable assets sell for the same monetary value, irrespective of how they are financed. This is besides known as the jurisprudence of preservation of value.

Arbitrage Argument

See two houses U and L, similar in all respects except in their capital construction. Firm U is unlevered, financed by equity entirely and steadfast L is a levered house.

The value of the levered house is higher than that of the unlevered house. Such, a state of affairs, argue MM, can non prevail because equity investors would make good to sell their equity in house L and invest in house U with personal purchase. For illustration, if an investor owns 10 % equity in house L, he would:

  1. Sell his equity in house L for Rs. 56,250
  2. Borrow Rs. 50,000, an sum equal to 10 % of L ‘s debt at an involvement rate of 12 % .
  3. Buy 10 % of house U ‘s equity for 1,00,000.

An addition in fiscal purchase increases the expected net incomes per portion but non the portion monetary value. This is because the alteration in the expected net incomes is offset by a corresponding alteration in the return required by stockholders.

We know, re = Ra + ( ra-rd ) ( D/E )

Preposition II states that ‘The expected return on equity is equal to the expected rate of return on assets, plus a premium. The premium is equal to the debt-equity ratio times the difference between the expected return on assets and the expected return on debt. ‘

The general deductions are that for low degrees of debt, the house ‘s debt is considered riskless. This means that rd is independent of D/E and therefore rhenium additions linearly with D/E. As the debt reaches a threshold bound, the hazard of default additions and the return on debt rd rises. To counterbalance this, the rate of addition in re lessenings. This happens because, beyond the threshold degree, a part of the house ‘s concern hazard is borne by the providers of the debt capital.

WACC Warnings

Sometimes the aim in funding is non ‘maximize overall market value ‘ but to ‘minimize the WACC. ‘ If MM ‘s proposition 1 holds true so they are tantamount aims. However, if they do n’t, so the capital construction that maximizes the value of the house besides minimizes its WACC.

Warning 1: Stockholders want direction to increase the house ‘s value. They are more interested in being than in having a house with low WACC.

Warning 2: Since stockholders demand higher expected rates of return than bondholders, hence debt is the cheaper capital beginning, so WACC can be reduced by borrowing more. However, this excess adoption leads the shareholders to demand a still higher expected rate of return. [ 17 ]

Criticisms of MM Theory

  • Firms are apt to pay revenue enhancements on their income.
  • Bankruptcy costs are rather high.
  • Agency costs exist because of struggle of involvement between directors and stockholders.
  • Directors have a penchant for a certain sequence of funding.
  • Personal purchase and corporate are non perfect replacements.

TRADE-OFF THEORY OF CAPITAL STRUCTURE

It states that a company chooses how much debt finance and equity finance to utilize by equilibrating the costs and benefits. It states that there is an advantage to funding with debt which is thetax benefits of debtand there is a cost of funding with debt which is the costs of fiscal hurt includingbankruptcy costs of debtand non-bankruptcy costs. A house that isoptimizes its overall value focuses on the tradeoff when taking how much debt and equity to utilize for funding.

COSTS OF FINANCIAL DISTRESS

Different houses and different industries will hold different magnitudes of costs if they encounter fiscal hurt. With some houses, hurt will ensue in both clients and providers flying. With other houses, the fact that a house is near to bankruptcy will non impact clients. When a house experiences fiscal distress several things can go on.

  • Arguments between stockholders and creditors delay the settlement of assets. Bankruptcy instances take old ages to settle and during this period machineries and equipments rust and go disused.
  • Assetss sold under hurt conditions, bring a monetary value lesser than their economic value.
  • The legal and administrative costs associated with bankruptcy are rather high.
  • Directors may take down the quality of goods, give unacceptable client service, ignore public assistance in a command to last in the short tally.

BANKRUPTCY COSTS OF DEBT

These the increased costs of financing withdebtinstead ofequitythat consequence in a higherprobabilityofbankruptcy. The fact that bankruptcy is by and large a dearly-won procedure and non merely a transportation ofownershipimplies that these costs negatively affect the totalvalueof the house. These costs can be thought of as a fiscal cost, because as the chance of bankruptcy increases the fiscal costs additions.

PECKING Order THEORYORPECKING ORDER MODEL

Itstates that companiesprioritizetheir beginnings of funding harmonizing to the jurisprudence of least attempt, or of least opposition, preferring to raise equity as a funding agency of last resort. Hence, internal financess are used foremost, and when that is depleted, debtis issued, and when it is non reasonable to publish any more debt, equity is issued. This theory maintains that concerns adhere to ahierarchyof funding beginnings and prefer internal funding when available, and debt is preferred over equity if external funding is required.

AGENCY COST

It is aneconomicconcept that relates to the cost incurred by an organisations associated with jobs such as divergentmanagement-shareholder aims andinformation dissymmetry. The information dissymmetry causes the bureau jobs ofmoral hazard andadverse choice. Agency costs chiefly originate due to divergence of control, separation of ownership and control and the different objectives the directors consider.

Kinds OF ANALYSIS FOR CHOOSING THE CAPITAL STRUCTURE

  • Leverage Analysis
  • EBIT – EPS Analysis
  • ROI – Roe Analysis
  • Ratio Analysis
  • Cash Flow Analysis
  • Comparative Analysis
  • Capital Structure Policies in Practice

We will see a few in item.

Leverage Analysis:

Leverage arises from the being of Fixed Costs.

There are two sorts of Leverage:

Operating Leverage: arises from the house ‘s Fixed Operating costs such as wages, depreciation, insurance, belongings revenue enhancements, and advertisement spendings.

Fiscal Leverage: arises from the house ‘s Fixed Financing Costss such as Interest on Debt.

Operating purchase arises from the being of fixed operating disbursals. When a house has fixed operating disbursals, 1 per centum alteration in unit gross revenues leads to more than 1 percent alteration in EBIT. See the instance of a house, XYZ Limited which is presently selling a merchandise at Rs 1000 per unit. Its variable costs are Rs 500 per unit and its fixed operating costs are Rs 200,000. The net incomes before involvement and revenue enhancements at two degrees of gross revenues, viz. , 500 units and 600 units, is shown below:

In the above illustration, a 20 per centum addition in unit gross revenues leads to a 100 per centum addition in net income before involvement and revenue enhancements, thanks to the being of fixed operating costs. Hence, fixed operating costs magnify the impact of alterations in grosss. This the magnification works in the rearward way every bit good.

It measures the consequence of alteration in gross revenues gross on the degree of PBIT.

  • Fiscal purchase emanates from the being of fixed involvement disbursals.

The usage of fixed-charges beginnings of financess, such as debt and penchant capital, along with proprietors ‘ equity in the capital construction is known as fiscal purchase ( or pitching or trading on equity ) . When a house has fixed involvement disbursals, 1 per centum alteration in net income before involvement in revenue enhancements ( PBIT ) leads to more than 1 percent alteration in net income before revenue enhancement ( or net income after revenue enhancement or net incomes per portion ) . See the instance of XYZ Limited, which presently has an PBIT of Rs 50,000. Its fixed involvement disbursals are Rs 30,000 and its revenue enhancement rate is 50 per centum. It has 10,000 portions outstanding. The net income before revenue enhancement, net income after revenue enhancement, and net incomes per portion for XYZ Limited at two degrees of PBIT, viz. , Rs 50,000 and Rs 60,000 are shown below:

In the above illustration a 20 per centum addition in PBIT leads to a 50 per centum addition in net income before revenue enhancements ( or PAT or EPS ) , thanks to the being of fixed involvement disbursals. Hence, fixed involvement disbursal magnifies the impact of alterations in PBIT. The magnification works in the rearward way every bit good.

The fiscal purchase employed by a company is intended to gain more return on the fixed-charge financess than their costs. The excess ( or shortage ) will increase ( or lessening ) the return on the proprietors ‘ equity.

  • Combined purchase, or entire purchase, arises from the being of fixed operating costs and involvement disbursals. Due to the being of these fixed costs, 1 per centum alteration in unit gross revenues, leads to more than 1 percent alteration in PBT ( or PAT or EPS ) .

See the instance of XYZ Limited, which presently has grosss of Rs 500,000. ( Rs 500 units are sold at Rs 1,000 per unit ) . Its variable costs are Rs 500 per unit and its fixed operating costs are Rs 200,000. Its fixed involvement disbursals are Rs 30,000 and its revenue enhancement rate is 50 per centum. It has 10,000 portions outstanding. The fiscal profile of the company at two degrees of gross revenues viz. 500 units ( the current degree ) and 600 units ( a degree 20 per centum higher than the current degree ) is shown below.

In the above illustration, a 20 per centum addition in unit gross revenues leads to a 250 per centum addition in net incomes per portion, due to the being of fixed operating costs and involvement disbursals.

Besides, fixed costs magnify the impact of alterations in unit gross revenues.

Degree of Combined Leverage

It refers to the sensitiveness of PBT ( or PAT or EPS ) to alterations in unit gross revenues or gross revenues.

PBIT-EPS Analysis

EPS is sensitive to alterations in PBIT under different funding options.

ABC Limited plans to raise extra capital of Rs. 10 million for financing an enlargement undertaking. In this context, it is measuring two alternate funding programs: ( I ) issue of equity portions ( 1 million equity portions at Rs. 10 per portion ) , and ( two ) issue of unsecured bonds transporting 14 percent involvement.

The break-even EBIT for two alternate funding programs is the degree of EBIT for which the EPS is the same under both the funding programs. It can be diagrammatically obtained by plotting the relationship between PBIT and EPS under the two options and observing the point of intersection.

The breakeven degree of PBIT is Rs. 2.8 million. If PBIT is below Rs. 2.8 million, equity funding is preferred to debenture funding ; if PBIT is higher than Rs. 2.8 million, the opposite holds. The breakeven degree of PBIT is Rs. 2.8 million. If PBIT is below Rs. 2.8 million, equity funding is preferred to debenture funding ; if PBIT is higher than Rs. 2.8 million, the opposite holds.

The EBIT indifference point between the two alternate programs can be obtained as follows:

ROI-ROE Analysis

Suppose a house ABC Limited requires an investing of Rs.100 million and is sing:

We can reason that:

  • ROE under capital construction A is higher than the ROE under B when ROI is less than the cost of debt.
  • The ROE under the two capital constructions is the same when ROI equal to the cost of debt. Hence, the indifference value of ROI is equal to the cost of debt.
  • The ROE under capital construction B is higher than the ROE under capital construction A when ROI is more than the cost of debt.
  • Cash Flow Analysis

  • The hard currency flow attack establishes the debt capacity by analyzing the chance of default. It involves the undermentioned stairss:
  • Mention the ‘tolerance bound ‘ on the chance of default. This shows the hazard attitude of direction.
  • Stipulate the ‘probability distribution of hard currency flows ‘ taking into history the jutting public presentation of the house.
  • Calculate the ‘fixed charges ‘ by involvement payment and chief refund associated with different degrees of debt.
  • Estimate the ‘debt capacity ‘ of the house as the highest degree of debt which is acceptable, given the tolerance bound.

CONCLUSION AND LEARNINGS

While some signifiers have been able to joint their capital construction policy, others have still to make so. The ground why many houses have non been able to specify their capital construction policy can be due to widening of instruments of finance. Before the outgrowth of imparting fiscal establishments, houses relied to a great extent on internal accumulations and there was deficiency of long experience with debt. Besides the alteration of gait in the Indian industries has quickened the debut of new merchandises and services. These developments are changing the skin color of concern hazards.

The cardinal points to a successful fiscal scheme are:

  • Develop a steady relationship with the merchandiser bankers as it is indispensable for raising fundss.
  • Bing in a province of preparedness is the kernel of funding.
  • Give a squad to Treasury Management to continually measure the developments in assorted markets to place funding chances.
  • Delinking of funding and investing determinations is a smart pick. A house should raise fundss whenever the market conditions are favorable irrespective of whether it has immediate investing undertakings or non.
  • Thinking international and covering with globalisation as a irresistible impulse is besides a of import method.
  • Intensify the market for its debt to avoid atomization of issues.

Mentions

  1. Brigham, Eugene F. Fundamentals of Financial Management. 5th erectile dysfunction. Dryden Press, 1989
  2. The Journal of Applied Business Research- Profit Margin And Capital Structure: An Empirical Relationship by Nikolaos P. Eriotis, University of Athens Zoe Frangouli, Athens University of Economics and Business
  3. hypertext transfer protocol: //www.valuebasedmanagement.net/
  4. Disagreement and Flexibility: A Theory of Optimal Security Issuance and Capital Structure by Arnoud W.A. Boot ( Faculty of Economics and Econometrics, University of Amsterdam ) , Anjan V. Thakor ( a.w.a.boot @ uva.nl ) ( University of Michigan Business School )
  5. The capital construction determination By Harold Bierman
  6. hypertext transfer protocol: //finance.toolbox.com
  7. The design of internal control and capital structure- by Elazar Berkovitch and Ronen Israel A© 1996 Oxford University Press
  8. The Journal of Business Studies- Determinants of Capital Structure: A Case Study of Listed Companies of India by Keshar J. Baral, PhD*
  9. Capital Structure Decisions During a Firm ‘s Life Cycle by Maurizio La Rocca1, Tiziana La Rocca1 and Alfio Cariola University of Calabria, Italy
  10. Merchandise Market Competition and Capital Structure: Empirical Evidence from the Newspaper Industry by Ernesto Schargrodsky*
  11. Investment Management & A ; Financial Innovations, 2006 by Hakan Karabacak
  12. Fiscal Management by Prasanna Chandra
  13. Principles of Corporate Finance by Richard Brealey, Steward C Meyers, Franklin Allen and Pitabas Mohanty