Marie Antoinette Of France History Essay

Marie Antoinette of France is a outstanding tragic figure in Gallic Revolution for her decease at the closure by compartment which was compelled by the Revolutionaries. The propaganda before and during the Gallic Revolution utilised the misconceptions of the Queen, established chiefly by the hostility between France and Austria, in effort to work Marie Antoinette as a whipping boy of the poorness and the eruption of the Revolution. Despite her faithful responsibility as the Jesus of the Gallic royal line, she was profoundly resented foremost by the conservative blue bloods so the full state. This brings in the question of: to what extent does propaganda successfully picture the factual image of Marie Antoinette in 1770-1793? Surely, the propaganda played a great function in footings of brainwashing the state to comprehend the Queen as the life symbol of both moral and physical corruptness and unfaithfulness. However, to what extent was it able to picture and convey the existent image of Marie Antoinette? The scrutiny of beginning, intent, values and restrictions of two major beginnings portraying the function of propaganda will find its truth of the portraiture of the Queen.

Summary of grounds

Marie Antoinette, born as the Archduchess 2 November 1755, became the Dauphine of France, in the twelvemonth 1770,[ 1 ]through the matrimony arranged by her female parent, the Empress Maria Theresa of the Habsburg Empire, in effort to accommodate the Austro-French relationship. However, the matrimony finally increased the tenseness between two states and reinforced the bitterness of Austria from the nobility category from the tribunal ensuing in tribunal rumor on Antoinette, such as her concealed individuality as the Austrian Spy. Despite her function as the partner of King Louis XVI and the Queen of France, her repute was shattered and low. As her stay in the Gallic tribunal lengthened, the rumor turned into the propaganda that influenced the populace of France. Not to advert the tribunal rumor, booklets such as libel circulated in both verbal and ocular signifiers. The studies on the “ grandiose banqueting, against the background of a Petit Trianon pasted with diamonds and glistening with gold ”[ 2 ]established another ground for the citizens of France to inveigh against the foreign Queen step ining in their fatherland. The rumor intensified amongst the populace to strongly hate her through the use of Marie Antoinette as the whipping boy of the whole fiscal state of affairs of France.

Furthermore, her engagement in the Diamond Necklace matter reinforced her visual aspect as the symbol of populating corruptness and unfaithfulness. Despite the polite rejection made by her considerate and house determination shown by her personal remarks: “ we have more demand of ships than diamonds, ”[ 3 ]and “ She found her gem instances rich plenty, ”[ 4 ]the populace refused to comprehend her as the inexperienced person in the incident as her repute created by the rumor stereotyped her as “ Madame Deficit. ”[ 5 ]

Disgraceful booklets, Libel, were the beginnings of explicit erotica which had “ specific, local ( and ) , satirical marks[ 6 ]“ By the clip she intensified her “ frivolousness, indecency, denaturation, contempt for her hubby and squandering of the kingdom, sexual audaciousness and homicidal madness, ” she became the regular supporter in booklets. Libel contributed towards converting the populace to believe her portraiture as the life symbol of the corruptness and untrusty monster in the signifier of sovereign.

The messages from the possible revolutionist as an educating support of bitterness towards the sovereign were successful as they depicted her evil nature associated with bibulous binges and criminal conversation[ 7 ]. Furthermore, the messages created the most celebrated quotation mark of the Queen “ Let them eat bar ”[ 8 ]by portraying her ignorance to confront the province of state and, besides uncovering her “ offenses lies non in an act, but in a quality of being. ”[ 9 ]

Evaluation of Beginnings

“ Marie Antoinette: The Journey[ 10 ]“ originates as the consequences of an extended research done by Antonia Fraser whom has “ nine acclaimed historical plants[ 11 ]“ in 2001. The intent of the life is to measure by how far was Antoinette a victim of misogynism or her ain actions, therefore determine whether she had the “ extravagancy and frivolousness ( which ) helped to convey down the Gallic monarchy[ 12 ]. “ Furthermore, the intent can be extended to analyze the truth of the rumors and of any derogatory unfavorable judgments made, such as “ sexual slurs made against her[ 13 ]. ” The beginning is so valuable as it incorporates Fraser ‘s comprehensive scope of beginnings embedded within it. Furthermore, the intent of the life is valuable as it continues to narrate the myth of her life in an limitless position by measuring both sides towards the narrative. However, the beginning has restrictions, as the life was written by a novelist non a certified historiographer. This hence reduces the dependability of the factual cognition mentioned in the life, even if she is outstanding for her historical lifes. In add-on, the beginning was published centuries after the existent event, therefore the hindsight narrative somehow weakens the preciseness of the analysis of Marie Antoinette ‘s life.

“ The Royal Bordello ” in “ The wicked queen: the beginnings of the myth of Marie Antoinette ” has its beginning as one of the propaganda pamphlets that circulated in public during the Queen ‘s reign, and now is stored as Bibliotheque Nationale, Enfer 605, discrepancy Enfer 606[ 14 ]. Its primary intent was to defame Marie Antoinette ‘s public image and farther criticise her degenerate desire for criminal conversation. Furthermore to inform and convert the public outside the walls of Versailles about how the sovereign abuses her authorization and the ability to suit work forces in effort to carry through her personal wants. The beginning is valuable as her character traits, set up by the description of the Queen ‘s decadent sex life with multiple work forces, uncover a dimension of her being a sex-thirsty monster that is egoistic to care for her people, therefore turn outing that she is non the victim, she is the beginning of all of France ‘s bad lucks. The restrictions of the beginning are its 3rd all-knowing position in the narrative of the Queen ‘s sex personal businesss, presuming to cognize every item of Queen ‘s head and actions. Furthermore, because of the undependable nature of propaganda, this booklet has many hyperboles which distort the differentiation between the truth and rumor.


Marie Antoinette ‘s refusal to follow with the Gallic methodical tribunal etiquettes, yet her unwilled willingness to use the symbolic representation of the Queen, to be the whipping boy of the poorness and the eruption of Revolution, were the major marks of the propaganda. Antoinette so was acquisitive in buying the latest manner,[ 15 ]and the propaganda turned Queen ‘s involvement in overbuying into the beginning of poorness outside the Versailles, such as the mostly disputed Diamond Necklace matter. The booklets ‘ clever turn of the common factual cognition into multiple hyperbolised histories of Queen ‘s life aimed to floor the populace with extremely closely narrated Marie Antoinette ‘s demeanor.

Critics such as Mary Wollenstonecraft whom lived in the epoch, depict Antoinette as a demoted representation of corruptness and unfaithfulness through the erotica, criminal conversation, homosexualism and greed. Subjecting Antoinette to a adult heroine, Wollenstonecraft devalues Antoinette ‘s societal hierarchal position, as the Queen, into a lower classed cocotte. Furthermore, Wollenstonecraft farther condemns Antoinette for her repute of the life symbol of both moral and physical corruptness and unfaithfulness by noticing that “ The Queen was even more corrupt than a prostitute because at least the prostitute is attentive to the regulations and etiquette of her trade, whereas the Queen flaunted her incontinence.[ 16 ]“ The quotation mark is reinforced in one of the widely circulated booklets, “ The Royal Bordello, ” which depicts utmost hetero and homosexual erotisms promoted by the Queen. Wholly with her association with France ‘s adversary, Austria, Antoinette was blamed to be an Austrian undercover agent, polluting the tribunal with her demeanors and destroying the economic system

On the other manus, there is an reading that propaganda was non able to to the full portray the factual image of Marie Antoinette as she was exhaustively victimised by derogatory unfavorable judgments, mentioned in the libels. Edmund Burke is another critic who depicted Antoinette strictly based on the “ allegorical organic structure of the Queen[ 17 ]. ” He one time described Antoinette as a “ delicious visionaˆ¦glittering like the morning-star, full of life and luster, and joy.[ 18 ]“ This was possible to be said by propaganda, as Burke believed Antoinette embraced “ two organic structures: one royal, the other female,[ 19 ]“ significance Antoinette was a human although she had her societal position so superior ; she still was a human who committed wickedness like the populace, harmonizing to the faith of the clip. She was royal due to the authorization she had but was subjected to perpetrate offenses. Hence as Burke mentioned, “ citizens should handle a queen with fear regardless of her character as an corporal person. ” Hence both positions shown in the beginnings evaluated antecedently, in add-on to the historiography mentioned in the analysis reveal that Marie Antoinette has been factually portrayed with an exposure to the two dimensions of her personalities: the Monarch and a adult female.


Continuously leting the booklets to destroy her royal image by holding wild binges, utmost hetero and homosexual life and overspending, Marie Antoinette was able to use herself as the whipping boy of the poorness and the symbol of both moral and physical corruptness and unfaithfulness. Handed over at the age of 15, Antoinette was non able to populate with the superficially rigorous Gallic. By giving up her full ownership that enabled her of the reminiscence of Austria, the queen embraced a new manner of happening comfort and pleasance: societal corruptness that existed under the surface. Extensive rumors have ruined her public reputes as the Queen of France, since she failed to demo the traits of conservative, inactive and gracious Queen ; but with two opinionative voices in the propaganda, Marie Antoinette was able to be genuinely depicted to an extent that both showed the Queen Marie Antoinette and the adult female Marie Antoinette.