How China Was Open To Western Influences History Essay

China enjoyed a favourable balance of trade with the West as they received great sums of money for silk, porcelain, and tea. So much money poured into China that Chinese bargainers became the richest work forces in the universe. Because of their economic laterality at the clip China was able to impart all foreign trade through ports with designated warehouses, such as the 1s in Canton. The age old economic high quality of the East would shortly be threatened by the West.

Opium use began in China in the 17th century and became a major socio-economic job by the mid 18th century. A figure of edicts were established by the Daoguang emperor in an effort to criminalize the use of Opium, but to no help. The demand for the drug was so heavy that the British merchandisers were get downing to pay for their purchases with Opium. Soon British merchandisers would go Opium runners as the emperor began to implement greater limitations on foreign bargainers and shortly Britain found that Opium was the key to changing the trade instability.

Grown on the hillsides of conquered India, the British invested massively in the cultivation, industry, and distribution of Opium into China. They shipped the drug non merely to the warehouses in Canton, but besides up through China ‘s rivers perforating about the full state, and the stableness of Chinese society became threatened as the drug began to eat at China ‘s societal cloth.

In 1839 the emperor decided that Lin Zexu would be placed in charge of discontinuing the flow of Opium into the state, and he began to put besieging on aliens and their goods. Queen Victoria was petitioned by Lin for aid, but was met with refusal. Zexu responded by coercing the merchandisers to manus over their opium shops and imprisoned British merchandisers for withstanding Chinese Torahs. In all, he took 350 British merchandisers into detention and ordered them to turn over more than 20,000 thoraxs of opium, so the opium balls were assorted with Lye and flushed into the Pearl River delta. This “ unjust ” intervention of British merchandisers and would ensue in a revenge by force from the British who would conveniently get the better of the Chinese.

The understanding that ended the first Opium War was the Treaty of Nanjing that ceded Hong Kong to Great Britain and was considered unequal because China did all the giving and received nil in return. Initially the Chinese believed that their generousness matched their traditional benevolence ; nevertheless, shortly realized that the intent of this pact really changed the model of foreign trade. The pact itself was nonnegotiable and it promised that each state would have every right and privilege that every other state received. Not merely did the Western merchandisers have entree to the Canton ports, the commissariats of this pact opened up an extra four ports throughout China, which besides brought in a figure of aliens into bing Chinese metropoliss, and some were placed in places of authorization being able to measure and roll up revenue enhancements.

Bello believes that the usage of Opium across the Qing State developed into a societal job, weakening the dynasty, and leting British merchandisers to take advantage by carry throughing a demand. He points out that Opium was the medium that linked China with the Western universe, but argues that the state ‘s economic dependence on Opium and deficiency of will by the Chinese authorities to command it was a direct cause that opened the door for British runners and finally caused the Opium War. This sentiment is consistent with Man-Houng Lin, composing for the Institute of Modern History, when she concluded that China ‘s “ national security considerations overrode national wellness concerns throughout the 19th century discourse on opium. ”[ 1 ]

Bello believes that opium use created “ a transimperial crisis that spread among an ethnically diverse public and created regionally distinguishable jobs of control for the Qing province. ”[ 2 ]His statement is that “ opium production, distribution and ingestion were carried out entirely by the Chinese in the mostly unexamined parts of western China ”[ 3 ]and shows an addition in peasant use of opium really began in the eighteenth century. ” ANOTHER AUTHORS ARGUEMENT

Bello argues that the province itself “ became physically and economically addicted to opium and the resulting dependence was a primary ground that prohibition in the sou’-west and inside was a failure. ”[ 4 ]Lin parrots this sentiment, saying that the “ regional continuity of the drug traffic is declarative of common failings and contradictions in province control over peoples and districts. ”[ 5 ]The restrictions of the local authoritiess proved to overthrow prohibition Torahs because “ the emperor ‘s ain construction of gross extraction resolutely linked the involvements of local government officials to those of local agriculturists. ”[ 6 ]From his position the opium job prematurely concerned gross, reasoning that the Qing China was “ spurred into action merely by its strong belief that drug ingestion was responsible for a bleeding of Ag abroad ” .[ 7 ]