Dynamic behaviour and seismic performance

1. Introduction

With improved apprehension of the dynamic behavior and seismal public presentation of constructions, legion promotions in temblor technology have been developed in recent old ages. The constructions can be designed, in the most cost effectual and safe mode, by using The the specific ability to pattern the dynamic structural behavior. For analytical modeling, the most widely used tool in structural technology analyses and design, is finite component method ( FEM ) . But “how accurately the established FEM is foretelling the dynamic features of the structure” , is a inquiry to chew over over. The ground for this issue is due to the mistakes present in the solution, ensuing from the estimate involved in the preparation of FEM. However, our concern in technology pattern is to accomplish a FEM which is capable of reproducing the existent structural behavior ( Yang and Chen 2009 ) . To get the better of this, the FEM should be refined or updated by utilizing the mensural responses from the existent or prototype construction.

The importance of field measurings, from an existent construction response, stems from the simple fact that these stand for the ground-truth about structural behavior. However, most of the current testing methods, such as shingle tabular array or pseudo-dynamic experiments, are restricted to laboratory-scale constructions and constituents. Furthermore, such idealised research lab experiments can non account for the complexness of in situ constructions, such as influence of environmental and operational conditions ( e.g. temperature, humidness, lading etc. ) , non-structural constituents, soil-structure interaction, etc ( Su et al. 2005 ; Trifunac and Todorovska 1999 ) . While, measurings from unmoved construction even on few points, presents a great trade of information about the structural public presentation ( Limongelli 2003 ) .

New Zealand is situated in such a part where temblors are a common happening. It lies at the border of the Australian and Pacific home bases ( Fig. 1 ) . Past temblors in the part have caused major losingss. The seismal response of constructions hence, is a major concern to the community. Like many other states, several constructions across New Zealand are instrumented under the streamer of GeoNet undertaking for measuring and apprehension of the dynamic behavior of constructions during temblors. GeoNet is a New Zealand Government undertaking to construct and run a modern geological jeopardy monitoring system. It comprises a web of geophysical instruments, automated package applications and skilled staff to observe, analyze and respond to earthquakes, volcanic activity, big landslides, tsunami, and the slow distortion that precedes big temblors. So far, GeoNet has placed an accent on entering land gestures and volcanic activity, but recent enterprises aim at widening GeoNet instrument arrays to monitoring of substructure such as edifices and Bridgess ( David Baguley and Young 2008 ; Deam and Cousins 2002 ) .

Interaction with the GeoNet direction and research workers enabled the University of Auckland an early entree to strong gesture informations from constructing supervising arrays in the Wellington and Canterbury parts. This PhD survey will analyse these informations. The present research will lend towards better appraisal of the behavior of constructions subjected to land gesture. This will besides be a pilot survey that will assist to understand the nature of GeoNet informations, and chances it presents and restrictions it may hold.

2. Aims

The primary aim of this research is “to investigate and better apprehension of the dynamic behavior of instrumented edifices by developing analytical theoretical accounts and graduating those utilizing filed informations so that these theoretical accounts can stand for existent behavior during earthquakes” . Following are the countries of focal point to accomplish this aim:

? Investigating the consequence of amplitude of response and the frequence content of many different temblors on the dynamic belongingss ( frequence, muffling ) of the instrumented edifice utilizing system designation

? Researching the consequence of environmental and operational conditions i.e. Temperature fluctuation, wet status and burden, on dynamic public presentation of edifices by utilizing average analysis and system designation

? Investigating the consequence of non-structural elements and soil-structure-interaction on structural response by integrating them in FEM simulations and comparing to the existent behavior during temblors.

? Researching new ways of graduating the Finite component theoretical accounts ( FEM ) utilizing field informations.

3. Literature Reappraisal

This subdivision presents an overview of:

– Seismic response of constructions

  • Amplitude dependence of frequence and muffling ratios of constructions
  • Consequence of soil-structure interaction

Seismic Response Of Structures

Well-instrumented edifices present an first-class chance during moderate to intense temblors for analyzing their seismal response and to look into the efficiency of seismal exposure appraisal methods. In this respect system designation techniques can be used to pull out dynamic features of an instrumented edifice, which forms an of import characteristic of entering the seismal gestures ( Miranda and Bertero 1996 ) . These surveies can besides be utile for the betterment of methodological analysiss involved in, design and analyses of constructions, and temblor jeopardy decrease programmes ( Celebi 1997 ) .

Lab trials can be utile but are non every bit complete as all-out or unmoved experiments. From civil technology point of position, the research lab graduated table experiments are non able to integrate many of import characteristics e.g. true effects of soil-structure interaction, environmental and operational conditions, and non-structural constituents. While the all-out trials present the as built environment which includes all the physical belongingss of world. However, the challenges of all-out or unmoved experiments are to detect, record and construe the world. The popularity of unmoved experiments is increasing since the debut of first strong gesture accelerograph to enter land gesture in early 1930 ‘s. Since so the instruments are installed in edifices, dikes and Bridgess to capture their existent response during temblors and ambient quivers ( Trifunac and Todorovska 1999 ) .

From unmoved experiments, it has been revealed that there are many factors on which the response particularly dynamic response of the constructions depends. It is observed that response is sensitive to the strength of the land gesture which governs the edifice distortions. Non-structural constituents ( NSC ) engagement in dynamic response is a map of edifice distortions ( Sashi et al. 2004 ) . Many research workers reported the engagement of NSC in the dynamic response during strong shaking ( Lee et al. 2007 ; Liew et Al. 2002 ; Torkamani and Ahmadi 1988 ) . During the trial of a tall edifice, it has been observed that NSC engagement in entire sidelong stiffness of the edifice is every bit much as 87 % ( Su et al. 2005 ) . The elaborate treatment on the inclusion of NSC in patterning and their consequence on response of constructions will be discussed in the subdivision 3.1.3.

Consideration of land gesture features, local site conditions and soil-structure interaction ( SSI ) is reported to hold considerable consequence on the seismal response of the edifices. During different temblors the response of the edifice is changing because of the degree of shaking, the site frequence which causes resonance, swaying and crushing phenomenon which emphasize the demand of soil-structure-interaction probe ( Celebi 1993 ; Celebi 1994 ; Celebi and Safak 1991 ; Celebi and Safak 1992 ) . Therefore, in seismically active parts of the universe, seismal monitoring of constructions makes up an built-in portion of hazard decrease schemes. States like United States, Japan, Taiwan, Mexico, Chile, Italy, Turkey and Greece have established extended programmes for monitoring of constructions during temblors ( Celebi 2007 ) . The consequence of response amplitude, frequence content of temblor and soil-structure-interaction on dynamic response of constructions are discussed in item in subdivision 3.1.1 and 3.1.2 severally.

The response of constructions to agitating over long term monitoring is highly complex. Significant research attempts have been dedicated to analyze the influence of environmental factors on dynamic features through field measurings and dynamic trials ( Farrar et al. 1997 ; Sohn et Al. 1999 ; Xia et Al. 2006 ) . It has been concluded that temperature is the major environmental factor doing fluctuation in average frequences and structural damping ( Li et al. 2009 ; Ni et Al. 2005 ; Yan et Al. 2005 ) . The influence of environmental conditions is detailed in the subdivision 3.1.4.

Amplitude Dependency Of Frequency And Damping Ratios Of Structures

Natural frequences and muffling ratios are really of import parametric quantities which affect the dynamic response of constructions under dynamic actions such as air current or temblor excitement. These dynamic features of edifice constructions are observed to depend on the quiver amplitude. The natural frequences are normally determined from conventional methods with sensible truth. The resonating acceleration of a vibrating construction is reciprocally relative to the square root of the damping. Experience has shown that muffling is one of the most hard structural parametric quantity to foretell at the design phase. It is hence, necessary to look into muffling utilizing all-out measuring on the bing constructions. These all-out experiments will assist in ( I ) look intoing the dynamic features and therefore response computations for the construction ( two ) bettering the apprehension of muffling mechanism, which will do possible, better theoretical theoretical accounts ( Littler 1995 ) .

Many research workers have investigated the amplitude dependence utilizing Random Decrement Technique ( RDT ) ( Tamura et al. 1993 ; Tamura et Al. 1994a ) . In a survey, RDT ranked by extremum amplitudes is used to cipher efficaciously the wind-induced response of three towers ( Tamura and Suganuma 1996 ) . Two processs were used by Tamura and Suganuma. In the first, RDT ranked by extremum amplitudes is used. The 2nd one calculates the dependance by set uping the dynamic features, estimated utilizing responses with assorted input degrees, in the order of the mean amplitude. They have observed for the investigated three towers that natural frequences tend to diminish with increasing amplitude while muffling ratio tend to increase ( Tamura and Suganuma 1996 ) .

Celebi in a survey has compared the fluctuation of muffling and cardinal periods for 5 instrumented edifices, utilizing low amplitude trials and strong gesture records. He observed the per centums of critical damping and the corresponding cardinal periods from low-amplitude trial informations appreciably lower than those determined from strong-motion recordings. It has been concluded that soil-structure-interaction, to be discussed in the following subdivision, and nonlinear behavior during strong shaking is the chief cause of this difference ( Celebi 1996 ) .

In another survey, the evident frequence alterations form one temblor to another has been investigated by taking 5 temblor excitements, recorded on Van Nuys seven storey hotel and 2 ambient quiver trials. It was observed that the frequence alterations depend on degree of agitating. Ambient quiver trials produced the largest frequences while the lowest frequences were observed during the largest shaking ( from 1994 Northridge temblor ) . For EW and NS way, the maximal alteration is by a factor of 2.2 ( 55 % ) and 3.5 ( 71 % ) severally. It was concluded that these alterations are due to the nonlinearity in the response of the foundation dirt ( Trifunac et al. 2001 ) .

Recently many research workers have given serious ideas to response of tall edifices under air current excitements. The ground behind the surveies is the existent damping ratio being a non-linear parametric quantity with amplitude-dependent belongings. To understand better this phenomenon, instrumented Di Wang tower in business district Shenzhen, China is studied during the transition of several typhoons ( Li et al. 2003 ; Wu et Al. 2007 ) . In 2001 Chicago All-out Monitoring Program is established to measure the public presentation of high-rise edifices by comparing their measured and predicted response. Under this plan 3 edifices in Chicago, USA, 1 in Seoul, Korea and 1 in Toronto, Canada are instrumented with GPS, accelerometers and wind gauges. The consequences achieved from these surveies show considerable amplitude dependence of frequence and muffling ratios due to air currents ( Correa 2009 ) . Wind-induced excitements are out of the range of this research survey so our focal point will be on temblor and ambient quivers merely.

Since many research workers ( Celebi 1996 ; Celebi et Al. 1991 ; Trifunac and Todorovska 1999 ) concluded that one of the major factors, in fluctuation of dynamic belongingss like frequence and muffling ratio under temblor excitement, is the non-linearity in foundation dirt and possible soil-structure-interaction, hence in the undermentioned subdivision consequence of soil-structure-interaction will be discussed in item.

Consequence Of Soil-Structure-Interaction ( SSI )

A construction, its foundation and the environing dirt constitute a system. Due to the flexibleness of dirt, the system period can be longer than the period of the fixed base edifice. The period can foster prolong if under big amplitude excitements, the construction or the foundation dirt or both experience nonlinearity in their response. Longer periods have been observed of the edifices during strong temblor excitements ( Trifunac et al. 2001 ; Udwadia and Trifunac 1974 ) . Since edifice period constitutes an of import portion in the design and analysis of temblor immune structures so it should be determined with extreme attention. Soil-structure-interaction probes hence, are necessary to see the existent response of constructions during temblors.

Numerous research surveies have reported the significance of soil-structure-interaction probes. Papageorgiou and Lin has studied the response of a 14 floor reinforced concrete Hollywood Storage edifice during Whittier Narrows temblor and observed clear grounds of SSI in the longitudinal way and weak SSI in the cross way. From the recorded supplantings, it was observed that stiffness in longitudinal way is more every bit compared to transverse way. This is due to the stiffer exterior longitudinal panels than the cross frames. The dirt at the site is comparatively stiff. The flexible transverse frames did non develop big base shear to deform it while on longitudinal way the stiffer frames and panels did so doing important SSI effects ( Papageorgiou and Lin 1991 ) .

Evaluation of SSI effects during strong gesture events was extensively studied by Celebi and Safak. The information from instrumented edifices was analyzed utilizing Fourier amplitude spectra and rocking and whipping phenomenon were observed. It was concluded that SSI strongly affects the structural response of the constructions during the event of strong shaking and can alter the cardinal frequence significantly ( Celebi and Safak 1991 ; Celebi and Safak 1992 ; Safak 1993 ) .

In another survey, SSI effects were explored by mensurating the response of the instrumented edifice during ambient quivers and Loma Prieta temblor ( LPE ) . The mensural frequence ratio of LPE over ambient quivers ( fLPE/fAMB ) was 0.70 for the first manner response ( E-W interlingual rendition ) and was 0.68 for the 2nd manner response ( N-S interlingual rendition ) . While muffling estimations observed were smaller in ambient quivers than LPE utilizing system designation techniques, to be discussed in subdivision 3.3. A computing machine theoretical account of the edifice was developed presuming ( I ) fixed base and ( two ) dirt springs. The frequence ratios between these two premises were fiting the mensural frequence ratios. It was concluded that the frequence difference between low ambient quivers and big temblor excitements was chiefly due to SSI ( Phan et al. 1994 ) .

Bhattacharya, Dutta et Al. assessed the SSI consequence by sing figure of scenarios in low-rise edifices on stray, grid termss and raft foundations utilizing computing machine patterning. They idealized the construction utilizing springs to integrate the dirt flexibleness and in-filled brick walls were idealized as tantamount compaction merely diagonal prances. The surveies showed that SSI effects can well act upon the response of low-rise structural systems ( Bhattacharya and Dutta 2004 ; Bhattacharya et Al. 2004 ; Dutta et Al. 2004 ) . To see the consequence of dynamic soil-structure-interaction on response of asymmetric edifices, Shakib and Fuladgar formulated a clip sphere attack. Three-dimensional system for asymmetric edifice was studied on different dirt conditions. Soil is idealized as additive elastic solid component and the contact surface between foundation and dirt is modelled as additive plane interface elements with nothing thickness. It was deduced that SSI effects cut down the sidelong and torsional supplantings of asymmetric edifices doing a lessening in clip period of the construction ( Shakib 2004 ; Shakib and Fuladgar 2004 ) .

A parametric system designation technique was used by Stewart and Fenves to measure SSI effects in edifices from strong gesture records. For fixed and flexible base modal parametric quantities, recordings of base rocking, sidelong roof, foundation and free-field gestures are required. This technique was implemented at 11 instrumented sites and the consequences achieved were compared good with known parametric quantities ( Stewart and Fenves 1998 ) . Another parametric quantity designation technique was developed by Lin et al. to analyze the SSI with torsional yoke ( TC ) . The foundation rocking every bit good as translational and torsional gestures of the foundation floor are required as input for the designation. The developed technique was applied to 2 instrumented edifices in Taiwan, viz. Civil and Environmental Engineering Building and Seismology and Applied Geo-physics Department Building at National Chung Hsing University. The strong gesture record measured at these two edifices during 1999 Chi-Chi Taiwan temblor was used for the survey. There was 21 % difference in cardinal period of the superstructure on a stiff dirt site. It was concluded that all of the foundation gestures should be included in system input to avoid longer than existent periods of constructions ( Lin et al. 2008 ) .

Mentions:

Bhattacharya, K. , and Dutta, S. C. ( 2004 ) . “ Assessing sidelong period of edifice frames integrating soil-flexibility. ” Journal of Sound and Vibration, 269 ( 3-5 ) , 795-821.

Bhattacharya, K. , Dutta, S. C. , and Dasgupta, S. ( 2004 ) . “ Effect of soil-flexibility on dynamic behavior of constructing frames on raft foundation. ” Journal of Sound and Vibration, 274 ( 1-2 ) , 111-135.

Celebi, M. ( 1993 ) . “ Seismic responses of two next edifices. I. Datas and analyses. ” Journal of structural technology New York, N.Y. , 119 ( 8 ) , 2461-2476.

Celebi, M. “ Response survey of a flexible edifice utilizing three temblor records. ” Structures Congress XII, Atlanta, GA, USA, 1220-1225.

Celebi, M. ( 1996 ) . “ Comparison of muffling in edifices under low-amplitude and strong gestures. ” Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 59 ( 2-3 ) , 309-323.

Celebi, M. ( 1997 ) . “ Response of Olive View Hospital to Northridge and Whittier temblors. ” Journal of Structural Engineering, 123 ( 4 ) , 389-396.

Celebi, M. ( 2007 ) . “ Developments in seismal monitoring for hazard decrease. ” Journal of Risk Research, 10 ( 5 ) , 715-727.

Celebi, M. , Phan, L. T. , and Marshall, R. D. ( 1991 ) . “ Comparison of responses of a choice figure of edifices to the 10/17/1989 Loma Prieta ( California ) temblor and low-level amplitude trial consequences. ” Publ by Natl Inst of Standards & A ; Technology, Tsukuba, Jpn.

Celebi, M. , and Safak, E. ( 1991 ) . “ Seismic response of transamerical edifice. I. Datas and preliminary analysis. ” Journal of structural technology New York, N.Y. , 117 ( 8 ) , 2389-2404.

Celebi, M. , and Safak, E. ( 1992 ) . “ Seismic response of Pacific Park Plaza. I. Datas and preliminary analysis. ” Journal of structural technology New York, N.Y. , 118 ( 6 ) , 1547-1565.

Correa, T. K. ( 2009 ) . “ Full graduated table monitoring: Three lessons learned from a Chicago plan. ” Structure, National Council of Engineers Association ( NCSEA ) , 701 S. Main Street, Fall River, WI 53932, 14-17.

David Baguley, and Young, J. ( 2008 ) . “ The Building Array Project. ” GeoNet News, GNS Science, PO Box 30-368, Lower Hutt 5040, New Zealand, 8.

Deam, B. L. , and Cousins, W. J. ( 2002 ) . “ Strong-motion instrumentality of edifices in New Zealand. ” New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering Conference, Napier, New Zealand.

Dutta, S. C. , Bhattacharya, K. , and Roy, R. ( 2004 ) . “ Response of low-rise edifices under seismal land excitement integrating soil-structure interaction. ” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 24 ( 12 ) , 893-914.

Farrar, C. R. , Doebling, S. W. , Cornwell, P. J. , and Straser, E. G. “ Variability of average parametric quantities measured on the Alamosa Canyon Bridge. ” Proceedings of the International Modal Analysis Conference – IMAC, Orlando, FL, USA, 257-263.

Lee, T. H. , Kato, M. , Matsumiya, T. , Suita, K. , and Nakashima, M. ( 2007 ) . “ Seismic public presentation rating of non-structural constituents: Drywall dividers. ” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 36 ( 3 ) , 367-382.

Li, H. , Li, S. , Ou, J. , and Li, H. ( 2009 ) . “ Modal designation of Bridgess under changing environmental conditions: Temperature and air current effects. ” Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 9999 ( 9999 ) , n/a.

Li, Q. S. , Yang, K. , Wong, C. K. , and Jeary, A. P. ( 2003 ) . “ The consequence of amplitude-dependent muffling on wind-induced quivers of a ace tall edifice. ” Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 91 ( 9 ) , 1175-1198.

Liew, Y. L. , Duffield, C. F. , and Gad, E. F. ( 2002 ) . “ The influence of gypsum board clad walls on the structural behavior of low rise residential edifices. ” Electronic Journal of Structural Engineering, 2 ( 2 ) , 1-16.

Limongelli, M. P. ( 2003 ) . “ Optimum location of detectors for Reconstruction of seismal responses through spline map insertion. ” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 32 ( 7 ) , 1055-1074.

Lin, C. C. , Wang, J. F. , and Tsai, C. H. ( 2008 ) . “ Dynamic parametric quantity designation for irregular edifices sing soil-structure interaction effects. ” Earthquake Spectra, 24 ( 3 ) , 641-666.

Littler, J. D. ( 1995 ) . “ An appraisal of some of the different methods for gauging muffling from all-out testing. ” Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 57 ( 2-3 ) , 179-189.

Miranda, E. , and Bertero, V. V. ( 1996 ) . “ Seismic public presentation of an instrumented ten-storey reinforced concrete edifice. ” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 25 ( 10 ) , 1041-1059.

Ni, Y. Q. , Hua, X. G. , Fan, K. Q. , and Ko, J. M. ( 2005 ) . “ Correlating modal belongingss with temperature utilizing long-run monitoring informations and support vector machine technique. ” Engineering Structures, 27 ( 12 SPEC. ISS. ) , 1762-1773.

Papageorgiou, A. S. , and Lin, B.-C. ( 1991 ) . “ Analysis of recorded temblor response and designation of a multi-story construction accounting for foundation interaction effects. ” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 10 ( 1 ) , 55-64.

Phan, L. T. , Hendrikson, E. M. , Marshall, R. D. , and Celebi, M. ( 1994 ) . “ Analytic modeling for dirt construction interaction of a 6 narrative commercial edifice. ” Fifth U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Earthquake Awareness and Mitigation Across the State, 199-208.

Safak, E. ( 1993 ) . “ Response of a 42-storey steel-frame edifice to the Ms = 7.1 Loma Prieta temblor. ” Engineering Structures, 15 ( 6 ) , 403-421.

Sashi, K. K. , Quan, N. , and Sherif, E.-T. ( 2004 ) . “ Modeling and Response Prediction in Performance-Based Seismic Evaluation: Case Studies of Instrumented Steel Moment-Frame Buildings. ” Earthquake Spectra, 20 ( 3 ) , 883-915.

Shakib, H. ( 2004 ) . “ Evaluation of dynamic eccentricity by sing soil-structure interaction: A proposal for seismal design codifications. ” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 24 ( 5 ) , 369-378.

Shakib, H. , and Fuladgar, A. ( 2004 ) . “ Dynamic soil-structure interaction effects on the seismal response of asymmetric edifices. ” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 24 ( 5 ) , 379-388.

Sohn, H. , Dzwonczyk, M. , Straser, E. G. , Kiremidjian, A. S. , Law, K. H. , and Meng, T. ( 1999 ) . “ An experimental survey of temperature consequence on average parametric quantities of the Alamosa Canyon Bridge. ” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 28, 879-897.

Stewart, J. P. , and Fenves, G. L. ( 1998 ) . “ System designation for measuring soil-structure interaction effects in edifices from strong gesture recordings. ” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 27 ( 8 ) , 869-885.

Su, R. K. L. , Chandler, A. M. , Sheikh, M. N. , and Lam, N. T. K. ( 2005 ) . “ Influence of non-structural constituents on sidelong stiffness of tall edifices. ” Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 14 ( 2 ) , 143-164.

Tamura, Y. , Shimada, K. , and Hibi, K. ( 1993 ) . “ Wind response of a tower ( typhoon observation at Nagasaki Huis Ten Bosch Domtoren ) . ” Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 50, 309-318.

Tamura, Y. , and Suganuma, S.-y. ( 1996 ) . “ Evaluation of amplitude-dependent damping and natural frequence of edifices during strong air currents. ” Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 59 ( 2-3 ) , 115-130.

Tamura, Y. , Yamada, M. , and Yokota, H. “ Estimation of structural damping of edifices. ” ASCE Structural Congress and IASS International Symposium 1994, Atlanta, USA, 1012-1017.

Tobita, J. ( 1996 ) . “ Evaluation of nonstationary muffling features of constructions under temblor excitements. ” Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 59 ( 2-3 ) , 283-298.

Torkamani, M. A. M. , and Ahmadi, A. K. ( 1988 ) . “ Stiffness designation of a tall edifice during building period utilizing ambient trials. ” Earthquake Engineering & A ; Structural Dynamics, 16 ( 8 ) , 1177-1188.

Trifunac, M. D. , Ivanovic, S. S. , and Todorovska, M. I. ( 2001 ) . “ Apparent periods of a edifice. I: Fourier analysis. ” Journal of Structural Engineering, 127 ( 5 ) , 517-526.

Trifunac, M. D. , and Todorovska, M. I. ( 1999 ) . “ Recording and construing temblor response of all-out constructions. ” Proc. Nato Advanced Research Workshop on Strong-Motion Instrumentation for Civil Engineering Structures, Kluwer Academic Publications, Istanbul, Turkey, 131-155.

Udwadia, F. E. , and Trifunac, M. D. ( 1974 ) . “ Time and amplitude dependent response of constructions. ” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2, 359-378.

Wu, J. R. , Liu, P. F. , and Li, Q. S. ( 2007 ) . “ Effectss of amplitude-dependent damping and clip changeless on wind-induced responses of ace tall edifice. ” Computers and Structures, 85 ( 15-16 ) , 1165-1176.

Xia, Y. , Hao, H. , Zanardo, G. , and Deeks, A. ( 2006 ) . “ Long term quiver monitoring of an RC slab: Temperature and humidness consequence. ” Engineering Structures, 28 ( 3 ) , 441-452.

Yan, A. M. , Kerschen, G. , De Boe, P. , and Golinval, J. C. ( 2005 ) . “ Structural harm diagnosing under changing environmental conditions – Part I: A additive analysis. ” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 19 ( 4 ) , 847-864.

Yang, Y. B. , and Chen, Y. J. ( 2009 ) . “ A new direct method for updating structural theoretical accounts based on measured modal informations. ” Engineering Structures, 31 ( 1 ) , 32-42.