Different types of physical cross-links

Physically Cross-linked Hydrogels. Hydrogels are said to be physically cross-linked when the cross-linking is achieved by H bonds, columbic forces or organize bonds with no chemical cross-linking agents. This type of polymer gelation is called sol-gel passage Figure 2 depicts physical gelation formed by different types of physical cross-links.

Bing biodegradable, they gels find applications chiefly in drug bringing, [ 1, 2 ] and protein encapsulation. [ 1, 2 ] . The deficiency of chemical cross-links aid in the decomposition of the hydrogels and conveying approximately better release rates for the encapsulated drug. Alginate hydrogels are premier illustrations for protein encapsulation and bringing. [ 3 ] The physical cross-links do non necessitate any rough dissolvers that may suppress protein activity. Furthermore, anionic hydrogels formed with alginate and Ca chloride consequences in doing the hydrogels reversible and AIDSs in the rapid debasement of the hydrogels in the presence of chelating or monovalent ions. [ 3, 4 ] However, these Hydrogels deficiency mechanical strength and are non stable over long periods of clip. [ 1, 2, 5 ]

Chemically Cross-linked Hydrogels. These hydrogels are cross-linked covalently bring forthing more stable and stiff cross-links which are more lasting. The formation of the polymer web involves the monomer, instigator and a cross-linker. Glutaraldehyde, ammonium persulphate ( APS ) with N, N, N’N’-tetramethylene-diamine ( TEMED ) and methylenebisacrylamide are common cross-linking agents employed. Glutaraldehyde has been used to cross-link hydrogels functionalized with aminoalkanes, hydroxyl and hydrazide groups covalently. [ 6, 7 ] . Edman and colleagues [ 8 ] have synthesized polymers with dextran which can be used as a bringing vehicle for colon malignant neoplastic disease therapy utilizing APS with TEMED along with methylenebisacrylamide. Polyesters and polymeric amides have been synthesized by condensation reactions between hydroxyl groups or aminoalkanes with carboxylic acids or their derived functions The same methodological analysis can be used to do hydrogels by cross-linking H2O soluble polymers organizing amide linkages utilizing N, N- ( 3-dimethylaminopropyl ) -N-ethyl carbodiimide ( EDC ) as a cross-linker. [ 9, 10 ] Apart from these common cross-linkers, effectual chemical cross-linking can besides be brought about utilizing enzymes. Recently, Sperinde and colleagues [ 11, 12 ] used transglutaminase which is a Ca2+ dependant enzyme to catalyse the reaction between the? -carboxamide group of the polythene ethanediol functionalized with glutaminyl groups ( PEG-Qa ) and the var epsilon-amine group of lysine to organize a stable amide linkage.

Stimuli Responsive Polymers. Stimuli-responsive polymer gels are of important involvement due to their ability to undergo controlled and reversible form alterations in response to assorted stimulations like temperature, pH, ionic, electrical, magnetic, and light or their combinations. [ 13-22 ] The hydrogels respond to the stimulation with a alteration in volume, two or 3-dimensional propulsion or flexing gesture.

Temperature antiphonal polymers. Temperature or thermo antiphonal polymers are the most widely studied stimuli antiphonal polymer. In add-on to the presence of hydrophilic groups, these polymers possess hydrophobic groups like methyl, ethyl and propyl groups. [ 21 ] Thermoresponsive polymers exhibit a lower critical solution temperature ( LCST ) which is the lowest temperature in the of the stage separation curve on concentration-temperature diagram. The polymers are hydrophilic below the LCST and swell when in contact with H2O molecules. Above the LCST, they expel H2O to organize a more stiff and compact hydrophobic construction.

  1. Zhang J-T, Huang S-W, and Zhuo R-X. Colloid & A ; Polymer Science 2005 ; 284 ( 2 ) :209-213.
  2. Hassan CM, Stewart JE, and Peppas NA. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics 2000 ; 49 ( 2 ) :161-165.
  3. Wells LA and Sheardown H. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics 2007 ; 65 ( 3 ) :329-335.
  4. Gombotz WR and Wee S. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 1998 ; 31 ( 3 ) :267-285.
  5. Kim YJ, Choi S, Koh JJ, Lee M, Ko KS, and Kim SW. Pharmaceutical Research 2001 ; 18 ( 4 ) :548-550.
  6. Peppas NA and Berner Jr RE. Biomaterials 1980 ; 1 ( 3 ) :158-162.
  7. Dai WS and Barbari TA. Journal of Membrane Science 1999 ; 156 ( 1 ) :67-79.
  8. Edman P, Ekman B, and Sjoholm I. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 1980 ; 69 ( 7 ) :838-842.
  9. Hennink WE and van Nostrum CF. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 2002 ; 54 ( 1 ) :13-36.
  10. Kuijpers AJ, van Wachem PB, new wave Luyn MJA, Engbers GHM, Krijgsveld J, Zaat SAJ, Dankert J, and Feijen J. Journal of Controlled Release 2000 ; 67 ( 2-3 ) :323-336.
  11. Sperinde JJ and Griffith LG. Macromolecules 2000 ; 33 ( 15 ) :5476-5480.
  12. Sperinde JJ and Griffith LG. Macromolecules 1997 ; 30 ( 18 ) :5255-5264.
  13. Nakayama M, Okano T, Miyazaki T, Kohori F, Sakai K, and Yokoyama M. Journal of Controlled Release 2006 ; 115 ( 1 ) :46-56.
  14. Gil ES and Hudson SM. Advancement in Polymer Science 2004 ; 29 ( 12 ) :1173-1222.
  15. Gupta P, Vermani K, and Garg S. Drug Discovery Today 2002 ; 7 ( 10 ) :569-579.
  16. Schmaljohann D. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 2006 ; 58 ( 15 ) :1655-1670.
  17. Szczubialka K, Jankowska M, and Nowakowska M. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine 2003 ; 14 ( 8 ) :699-703.
  18. Kathmann EEL, White LA, and McCormick CL. Macromolecules 1997 ; 30 ( 18 ) :5297-5304.
  19. Anal AK. Recent Patents on Endocrine, Metabolic & A ; Immune Drug Discovery 2007 ; 1:83-90.
  20. Pankhurst QA, Connolly J, Jones SK, and Dobson J. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 2003 ( 13 ) : R167.
  21. Qiu Y and Park K. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 2001 ; 53 ( 3 ) :321-339.
  22. Bawa P, Pillay V, Choonara YE, and Toit LCd. Biomedical Materials 2009 ( 2 ) :022001.