Assessing The Advantages Of Nuclear Power Engineering Essay

Nuclear energy, besides known as atomic energy, was foremost discovered by Gallic scientist Henri Becquerel in 1896. Harmonizing to Science Dictionary, atomic energy is an energy released by the karyon of an atom. The sum of energy released by the atomic fission of a given mass of U is approximately 2,500,000 times greater than that released by the burning of an equal mass of C. Due to the monolithic sum of energy released by atomic energy, the chase of atomic power began shortly after the find in the early twenty-four hours. Harmonizing to International Atomic Energy Agency, the universe ‘s first atomic power works, USSR’s Obninsk Nuclear Power Plant, which is bring forthing about 5 megawatts of electric power in 1954. Presently, there are 442 atomic power workss in the universe including China, India, South Africa and the United States. In China, atomic power workss provided 62.86 billion kWh, which is 2.3 % of entire electricity end product to China. ( World Nuclear Association, 2011 )

However, due to the insufficient advanced engineering of managing atomic power, ruinous accidents happened. A series of detonations at the Chernobyl works reactor figure four on 26 April, 1986. As a consequence, a plume of radioactive radioactive dust sent into the ambiance and drifted over big parts of the western Soviet Union, Eastern, Western and Northern Europe. ( World Nuclear Association, 2011 ) This was the worst atomic accident in the history of universe. As a consequence, the arising of anti-nuclear organisation grows quickly such as Greenpeace and Friend of The Earth. Anti-nuclear motions are transporting out within the United States, Europe and Asia Pacific. They protest the use of the atomic power has been out of its ain intent.

Besides that, with the rebellion of alternate power beginnings, people who support the use of the alternate power beginnings are besides raising their voices to oppugn atomic power research workers about the demand of atomic power for generate electricity. Options such as air current, biomass, hydroelectricity and solar power are cheaper and cleaner ways to bring forth electricity. For case, in Germany there are 21,164 wind turbines with the entire capacity of 25,777 megawatt installed and by the terminal of 2009, 38 TWh of air current electricity are being generated in 2009, which meant it occupies 7 % of Germany ‘s net electricity ingestion. ( German Wind Energy Association, 2010 )

Nuclear power is so one of the most current issues in the universe. Taking both the supporting and opposing positions of the society, associations, research workers and industries into consideration, the chief statement now centers on whether atomic energy should be used for bring forthing electricity. Subsequently, the ultimate inquiry that needs to be answered is: Can Nuclear power competes with alternate power beginnings?

Nuclear power can vie with alternate power beginnings because it offers phenomenal energy end product to the universe and it requires low costs which the fuel is cheap. Besides that, atomic power is all right to the environment which does non do nursery or acid rain consequence.

Therefore, the undermentioned study will hereby concentrate on the advantages of atomic power and the failings of the opposing statements. This study will be centered on western and eastern states where research and certification on advantages of atomic and alternate energy beginnings for bring forthing electricity are both comprehendible and thorough. The clip frame used in this study is from the 1890s boulder clay today.

Body of content

2.1 Phenomenal Energy Output

Advocates of options power beginnings say that major alternate energy beginnings like are able to bring forth abundant electricity supply. In 2005, there is 8933 MW of installed power capacity in 24 states, which are bring forthing 55709 GWh per twelvemonth of green power, which is harmonizing to the International Geothermal Association. Coal-fired power, which has been widely used in many states for several decennaries, supplies at least 40 % of electricity, which is 7692 TWh to the full universe. ( International Energy Agency, 2004 )

Harmonizing to International Energy Agency, the pie chart above shows the Coal-fired power generates 40.8 % of electricity to the universe whereas atomic power supplies 14.7 % of electricity to the universe in 2006. This can be defined that major power beginnings such as coal-burning power, gas, hydroelectric, oil and renewable power beginnings are providing abundant electricity to the universe.

However, this is incorrect as atomic power excessively have phenomenal energy end product. Nuclear power does supply about 14 % of the universe ‘s electricity as uninterrupted and dependable base-load power. As such the efficiency does increase twelvemonth by twelvemonth. Alternatively of coal-fire power, atomic power is the most powerful beginnings that can bring forth up to terawatts of electricity to the universe. Today, 442 atomic power workss in the universe and more than 15 states rely on atomic power for 25 % or more of their electricity. A recent Administration for Economic Co-operation and Development ( OECD ) surveies has been carried out ; by 2050 atomic power could go the largest beginnings of electricity worldwide and contribute about 25 % of all electricity.

World Nuclear Association stated that, France, which is refer from the saloon chart above, approximately 75 % of electricity is supplied by atomic power, which has the sum of 58 atomic reactors with entire capacity of over 63GWe out of 116GWe. The United States, the largest atomic electricity coevals in the universe. In 2008, 104 atomic reactors in USA generate 805 billion kWh out of 4119 billion kWh cyberspace of electricity, which ensuing of about 20 % of entire electricity coevals ( World Nuclear Association, 2011 ) . As can be clearly seen atomic power in France and the United States are critical to the full state. In short, the part of atomic power to provide electricity can non be neglected and atomic power can vie with other alternate power beginnings.

On the other manus, harmonizing to Nuclear Energy Institute, they claim that U fuel pellet contains high and concentrated energy. 1 uranium fuel pellet can be equaled to 1 ton of coal, 17000 three-dimensional pess of natural gas, and 5000 lbs of wood every bit good as 149 gallons of oil. As a consequence, atomic power can bring forth high electricity supplies compare to coal-burning power, gas, oil and burning of forests as little sum of fuel can bring forth monolithic power production. Therefore, atomic power non merely saves fuel but besides generates monolithic electricity end product.

In a nutshell, atomic power can vie with alternate power beginnings as merely little sum of fuel are require to bring forth electricity and atomic power generates monolithic electricity end product compare to alternate power beginnings. If atomic power has been widely used all over the universe, so it supplies phenomenal electricity to the universe. Hence the usage alternate power beginnings can be reduced. So, choose atomic power instead than alternate power beginnings, why non?